Jump to content
Forumu Destekleyenlere Katılın ×
Paticik Forumları
2000 lerden beri faal olan, çok şukela bir paylaşım platformuyuz. Hoşgeldiniz.

Marvel Cinematic Universe (Spoiler Alert!)


GERGE

Öne çıkan mesajlar

Bak adam çok güzel anlatmış benim düşündüklerimi, helal olsun aslanıma

Civil War'dan Mega Spoilerlar İçerir

Spider-Man was an integral part of the Civil War comic book series for two reasons. The first was because he is the highest profile character at Marvel Comics with a secret identity and a supporting cast of loved ones who aren’t part of the superhuman community – Aunt May and Mary Jane Watson – to protect. While Captain America and Iron Man were the ones waging the war, Captain America’s identity was already on file with S.H.I.E.L.D. and the government. As for Iron Man, his identity was secret at that point (though he quickly divulged it, for obvious reasons), but Tony’s never really been a family man, so the risk was primarily to himself.

No, Peter Parker definitely had the most to lose by revealing his secret identity, something that Marvel drove home when an assassin went looking for Peter and shot Aunt May instead. But this entire story thread is unnecessary for the film adaptation, because secret identities don’t mean the same thing in the Marvel Cinematic Universe as they do in the Marvel Comics Universe. In fact, the concept barely exists. Superheroes in the Marvel Cinematic Universe aren’t masked gods or street level vigilantes, they’re celebrities who live in a tower with their name emblazoned at the top for all to see. You don’t need to go looking for the Avengers, they’re sitting in plain sight.

Those involved with the film have already said that they’ll be altering the story of Civil War to make it less about superhero secret identities, so why shoehorn Spider-Man into it? On top of that, if a report from last week is to be believed, Marvel wants to reboot the Spider-Man film franchise to focus on a teen hero trying to balance his superhero life with his mundane responsibilities. That’ll be hard to do if they expose him as Peter Parker during his first day in the universe.

The second role that Spider-Man played in Civil War was to represent the shifting moral ground between Iron Man and Captain America. Spider-Man had become an Avenger not long before the events of Civil War, and revealed his identity to certain of his team-mates. He and Tony Stark quickly became close over their shared love of science, and Tony took Peter under his wing. So when the events of Civil War kicked off, Tony had Peter’s complete trust and agreed to go through with unmasking himself. It was a show of faith. Once Tony used his Thor clone in battle, and the clone killed Black Goliath, that faith in Iron Man was shattered, and Spider-Man jumped to Cap’s side.

Without Spider-Man’s stature in the Marvel Universe, and the pre-existing relationship with Tony Stark, these actions would be colored entirely differently. Instead of adult Spider-Man choosing, of his own accord, to back Tony’s play, the film version would seem like Tony Stark was manipulating some poor kid in a costume. And Spider-Man’s change of heart midway through the war wouldn’t have nearly as much meaning without him being established as the heart of the Marvel Universe.

In the end, Spider-Man’s presence in the narrative of Captain America: Civil War may actually cause more problems than it would solve. Sure, you can just throw him in there for a cameo, but that’s hardly necessary. And if you need a street level hero to take it on the chin to demonstrate the dangers of the Superhuman Registration Act, there are plenty of other options for Marvel to choose from, and one of them is making his Netflix debut in May (hint: it’s Daredevil).

Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş

Abi Spiderman'in Marvel elinden 2 tane filmi çıkmış olsa, Universe'te establish edilmiş bir karakter olsa BELKİ mantıklı olabilir ama adamı işlemeye başlar başlamaz unmask edersen ne anlamı var ki? Civil War'a entegre edicem diye adamın unmask olmasının ne derece big deal olduğunu işlemeyi es geçiyorsun, hiç bir anlamı kalmıyor. En az 2 film adamın aile bağlarını bokunu püsürünü işlemezsen ne bokuma sokarsın Civil War'a yani.

Korkuyorum gerçekten.
Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş

said:
The next step for Sony, of course, is to recast Spider-Man. The studio is looking to go back to Spidey’s roots and put the character back in high school, which would require it to cast a younger actor, Variety has learned. Andrew Garfield is no longer playing the character.

The studio is still moving forward with the Spider-Man villain-centric “Sinister Six,” and “Venom” spinoff, as well as a film that features female characters in the “Spider-Man” universe. “The Amazing Spider-Man 3″ has been cancelled. While Marvel’s Feige is involved with Sony’s new “Spider-Man” films, he currently is not expected to be creatively involved with the spinoffs, sources say.


yine liseli peter olmasa hoş olurdu aslında. Peter biraz daha yaşlı olsun sonra okula giden Miles koysalar filan.

birde sadece Spider Man'e el atıcakmış Marvel, öbür spin off filmleri çekeceklermiş yine Marvel'ın yardımı olmadan. Sinister Six ve Venom gelecek her türlü diyorlar.

http://variety.com/2015/film/news/details-spider-man-appear-in-sony-and-marvel-movies-1201429039/
Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş

Misafir
Bu konu yeni mesajlara artık kapalıdır.
×
×
  • Yeni Oluştur...