Genel Yönetici GERGE Mesaj tarihi: Ağustos 31, 2015 Genel Yönetici Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Ağustos 31, 2015 Yazari sevmedigim bir adam ama kitap iyi olmus, simdi okuyorum. http://www.amazon.com/SJWs-Always-Lie-Taking-Thought-ebook/dp/B014GMBUR4 Foreword Social justice divides the world into good and evil. It is a starkly Manichean view of the moral universe: one that pits heroic LGBT campaigners, feminists, transgender activists and #BlackLivesMatter protesters against the jackbooted fascists of the patriarchal, capitalist Establishment. Yet dig a little deeper, and you realise that the social justice view of the world is horribly patronising, two-dimensional and depressing. It suggests that our aspirations and opinions are necessarily bound by our circumstances of birth: that homosexuals must support grotesquely engorged public sectors to pay for “homophobia awareness” organisations whether they are needed or not; that women are always and in every circumstance victims; that blacks cannot succeed in life without special treatment. This tendency never survives contact with reality because it never sees the exceptions coming. Social justice warriors don’t understand that life, and people, are messy and complicated: that a gay person might, for entirely rational reasons and without a shred of self-loathing, object to the idea of gay marriage. SJWs Always Lie is a truism because you cannot make social justice arguments without purposefully omitting crucial facts. You cannot, in other words, be a social justice warrior in good faith. SJWs see no irony in judging people according to their orientation, skin colour and gender, particularly if they are “straight”, “white” and “male.” But even those of us on the fringes struggle to escape censure. I was born a conservative, but I chose to be homosexual. According to the most fashionable thinking in American media and the academy, I should not exist. The fact that I am gay yet refuse to acquiesce to third-wave feminism or grievance politics of any other kind strikes my ideological opponents as one of the great unexplained mysteries of the universe. (It’s why they can’t beat me in television debates.) Believing that a person’s sex, race and orientation defines the acceptable limits of the opinions they may hold is called “identity politics.” It’s a bizarre but flourishing cult in America today that makes fools of its supporters by presenting an insultingly reductionist view of human nature. We’re familiar with the attitude from stereotypical, sadistic preachers of popular fiction, but not for a hundred years here in the West have so many people from so many pedestals insisted on dictating to the rest of us how we shall live. From the dishonest critics of GamerGate to the bigoted and insulting #KillAllMen and #GiveYourMoneyToWomen hashtags, the social justice tendency is a narrow, bossy and often prurient prism from which to view humanity, and one that has acquired, as this book ably demonstrates, an especially poisonous self-righteousness in the last few years. Of course, authoritarians are not restricted to one side of the political divide. Nevertheless, it is an ironic and remarkable feature of the American Left that there is no longer space for liberals within American liberalism. That will be a disaster for Left-wing politicians and thinkers in future years because the great battle of the next decade won’t be between left- and right-wing visions of how society ought to be organised, but between the control freaks at Vice and Buzzfeed and the classical liberals of reddit, Twitter and the various image boards. The Left will be relegated to spectator status while the conflict plays out. Thanks to the intellectual fragility of social justice, its adherents have become rightly notorious for their cruel, hysterical and sociopathic modus operandi. But while the public is turning its back on lunatics in new media who claim that how men sit on the subway expresses something profound about the relationship between men and women, the zealots still occupy positions of influence in our society. Fortunately, there is a powerful weapon in our arsenal against the hand-wringers, pearl-clutchers, guilt-mongers and professional panickers—ridicule. You don’t have to agree with everything Vox Day writes on his popular blog to recognise that he is a master of the art of needling social justice warriors and one of the loudest and most persistent voices of the resistance. For writing this book he deserves our thanks. Milo Yiannopoulos Miami, Florida August 2015 Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
Laurelin Mesaj tarihi: Ağustos 31, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Ağustos 31, 2015 yazari gorur gormez kapatttim, boka bok demek icin baska bir boka ihtiyacimiz yok :( Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
aquila Mesaj tarihi: Ağustos 31, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Ağustos 31, 2015 Internet malları best seller yapar bunu. Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
yloibx Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 2, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 2, 2015 bi insan bunu niye okur? Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
eldar Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 tam lümpen işi. Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
axedice Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Laurelin said: yazari gorur gormez kapatttim, boka bok demek icin baska bir boka ihtiyacimiz yok :( Internet aristocrat değil miydi bu? Kötü bi adam mı nedir olayı? Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
Genel Yönetici GERGE Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Konuyu açan Genel Yönetici Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Kotu bir adam, ben de almazdim bunu asla normalde ama tavsiye geldi bir kac farkli yerden, aldim ben de. Okunur bir kitap. Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
Cuce Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 adını goruyoerum etraftada kendisni bilmiyorum nesi kötü adamın. kötü adam ne demek yahu hitlermi bu? Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
Gladmir Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Bu adam plot twist lerin krali diye gecer. Sacma sapan fasist soylemlerinin yaninda ayni zaman neo liberal olarak takilip cinsel tercihini her platform da dile getirmekten kacinmaz. Sizofren olmali. Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
axedice Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Ha muhafazakar gay diye mi sevilmiyor? Bizim aklgbt gibi asd Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
-Deno- Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 plot twist bolsa yerim Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
Laurelin Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Gay diil faggot bu, fasist herifin teki ve nefret dolu, cinsel yonelimi nedeniyle "ben gayim o yuzden bir azinlik olarak herkese her turlu boku soyliyebilirim" kafasinda Dramaticada aratin yazio zaten yedigi boklar, gg sirasinda bandwagona atlayip iyi prim yapti simdi zamaninda beles yazdigi yazilari kitap yapmis satmaya kasiyor iste, aklgbt bu heriften cok cok daha samimi :P Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
pascalnouman Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 Paylaş Mesaj tarihi: Eylül 3, 2015 hulooghhhhhhh Link to comment Sosyal ağlarda paylaş Daha fazla paylaşım seçeneği…
Öne çıkan mesajlar