Jump to content
Forumu Destekleyenlere Katılın ×
Paticik Forumları
2000 lerden beri faal olan, çok şukela bir paylaşım platformuyuz. Hoşgeldiniz.

2011 Türkiyesi

Napolyonn

Son yazan: Napolyonn
yeri: Konu Dışı

 Paylaş

Öne çıkan mesajlar

Napolyonn Rising Star

Napolyonn

Mesaj tarihi:
  • Konuyu açan
Mesaj tarihi:
ben vardır ı işaretledim.

sebebine gelirsek akp menşeili bir tehlike değil genel olarak parti odaklı bir otokrasi problemi olduğunu düşünüyorum. chp parti olarak otokrasiye meyilli bir parti olmasından dolayı zaten tek başına ele geçirirse sorunlar yaşanacaktır. akp ise karşısında "höst" diyecek adam bulamadığı için ileriki günlerde, özellikle haziran sonrasında dengesiz bir iç siyasi tablo çizebilir.
Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş
Ardeth Grand Master

Ardeth

Mesaj tarihi:
Mesaj tarihi:
bu arada bi dönem daha AKP seçilirse o tehlike var keza anayasa çalışmaları da başlatılıyor. bu kadar dediğim dedik yaptığım yağtıkçı bir partinin 1960 anayasası tarzı bir anayasa hazırlayacağını sanmıyorum. hatta tam demokrat partinin isteyeceği tarzdan üniversite ve medyanın hükümetin bi tarafını yalamasını teşvik edecek tarzdan şeyler bile bekliyorum. chpnin kadrosu biraz değişti o yüzden yeni kafa yapıları onu henüz daha tam oturup da incelemedim onları bilemiyorum
Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş
Bone Grand Master

Bone

Mesaj tarihi:
Mesaj tarihi:
bakalım tayyip hangisini seçecek:

seç birini bunlardan

otokrasi said:

An autocracy is a form of government in which one person possesses unlimited power. An autocrat is a person (such as a monarch) ruling with unlimited authority. The term autocrat is derived from the word autokratōr (lit. "self-ruler", or "one who rules by himself"). It is distinct from oligarchy ("rule by the few") and democracy ("rule by the people").
Today, the term autocrat is usually understood as synonymous with despot, tyrant and dictator, although each of these terms originally had a separate and distinct meaning.
Autocracy and totalitarianism are orthogonal concepts. Autocracy is defined by one individual having unlimited power, while totalitarianism extends to regulating every aspect of public and private life. Totalitarianism does not imply a single ruler, but extends to include absolute rule by any faction or class of elites who recognize no limit to their authority.
Autocracy differs from military dictatorship, as these often take the form of "collective presidencies" such as the South American juntas. However, an autocracy may be totalitarian or be a military dictatorship.
The autocrat needs some kind of power structure to rule. Most historical autocrats depended on their nobles, the military, the priesthood or other elite groups. As such, it can be difficult to draw a clear line between historical autocracies and oligarchies.


totaliterlik said:

Totalitarianism (or totalitarian rule) is a political system where the state, usually under the control of a single political person, faction, or class, recognizes no limits to its authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible. Totalitarianism is generally characterized by the coincidence of authoritarianism (where ordinary citizens have less significant share in state decision-making) and ideology (a pervasive scheme of values promulgated by institutional means to direct most if not all aspects of public and private life).
Totalitarian regimes or movements stay in political power through an all-encompassing propaganda disseminated through the state-controlled mass media, a single party that is often marked by personality cultism, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of speech, mass surveillance, and widespread use of state terrorism.


otoriterlik said:

Authoritarianism is a form of social organization characterized by submission to authority. It is opposed to individualism and democracy. In politics, an authoritarian government is one in which political power is concentrated in a leader or leaders, typically unelected by the people, who possess exclusive, unaccountable, and arbitrary power.
Compared to totalitarian systems, authoritarian systems may also leave a larger sphere for private life, lack a guiding ideology, tolerate some pluralism in social organization, lack the power to mobilize the whole population in pursuit of national goals, and exercise their power within relatively predictable limits.


diktatörlük said:

A dictatorship is defined as an autocratic form of government in which the government is ruled by an individual, the dictator.
A government controlled by one person, or a small group of people. In this form of government the power rests entirely on the person or group of people, and can be obtained by force or by inheritance. The dictator(s) may also take away much of its peoples' freedom.
In contemporary usage, dictatorship refers to an autocratic form of absolute rule by leadership unrestricted by law, constitutions, or other social and political factors within the state.
A dictatorship is a form of government that has the power to govern without consent of those being governed (similar to authoritarianism), while totalitarianism describes a state that regulates nearly every aspect of public and private behavior of the people. In other words, dictatorship concerns the source of the governing power (where the power comes from) and totalitarianism concerns the scope of the governing power (what is the government). In this sense, dictatorship (government without people's consent) is a contrast to democracy (government whose power comes from people) and totalitarianism (government controls every aspect of people's life) opposes pluralism (government allows multiple lifestyles and opinions).


despotluk said:

Despotism is a form of government in which a single entity, called the 'despot', rules with absolute power. That entity may be an individual, as in an autocracy, or it may be a group, as in an oligarchy. The word "despotism" means to "rule in the fashion of a despot" and should not be confused with 'despot'.
Despot comes from the Greek despotes, which roughly means "master" or "one with power", and it has been used to translate a wide variety of titles and positions. It was used to describe the unlimited power and authority of the Pharaohs of Egypt, employed in the Byzantine court as a title of nobility, used by the rulers of Byzantine vassal states, and adopted as a title of the Byzantine Emperors. Thus, despot is found to have different meanings and interpretations at various times in history and can not be described by a single definition. This is similar to the other Greek titles basileus and autokrator, which, along with despot, have been used at various times to describe everything from a local chieftain to a simple ruler, king or emperor.
Colloquially, 'despot' has been applied pejoratively to a person, particularity a head of state or government, who abuses his power and authority to oppress his people, subjects or subordinates. In this sense, it is similar to the pejorative connotations that have likewise arisen with the term 'tyrant'. 'Dictator' also has developed nearly similar pejorative connotations, though 'despot' and 'tyrant' tend to stress cruelty and even enjoyment therefrom, while 'dictator' tends to imply more harshness or unfair implementation of law.


faşizm said:

Fascism is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a country according to a particular nationalist strand of corporatist values and perspectives, with an emphasis on enforcing a collectivist form of political and economic organisation based on a tightly prescribed national identity. Fascism was originally founded by Italian national syndicalists in World War I who combined extreme Sorelian syndicalist political views along with nationalism. Though normally described as being on the far right, there is a scholarly consensus that fascism was also influenced by the left, but with a focus on solutions from the right.
Fascists believe that a nation is an organic community that requires strong leadership, singular collective identity, and the will and ability to commit violence and wage war in order to keep the nation strong. They claim that culture is created by the collective national society and its state, that cultural ideas are what give individuals identity, and thus they reject individualism. Viewing the nation as an integrated collective community, they see pluralism as a dysfunctional aspect of society, and justify a totalitarian state as a means to represent the nation in its entirety.
They advocate the creation of a single-party state. Fascist governments forbid and suppress opposition to the fascist state and the fascist movement. They identify violence and war as actions that create national regeneration, spirit and vitality.


sultanlık said:

Sultanism, another name for Despotism, is a form of authoritarian government characterized by the extreme personal presence of the ruler in all elements of governance. The ruler may or may not be present in economic or social life, and thus there may be pluralism in these areas, but this is never true of political power.
The term Sultanism is derived from the word Sultan, which is a title used in Muslim societies for a sovereign or absolute monarch. The Sultan was traditionally a secular office, unlike the Caliphate, and thus the term Sultanism should not be deemed anti-Islamic.
In Sultanism, the sultan may or may not adopt a ruling ideology but is never bound by any rules or given ideology, even his own. The sultan may also use whatever forces he can to exercise his personal will, such as para-militaries or gangs.


teokrasi said:

Theocracy is a form of government in which a state is understood as governed by immediate divine guidance especially a state ruled by clergy, or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided.
From the perspective of the theocratic government, "God himself is recognized as the head" of the state, hence the term theocracy, from the Greek "rule of God", a term used by Josephus of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah. Theocratic governments enact theonomic laws (rules).
A theocracy may be monist in form, where the administrative hierarchy of the government is identical with the administrative hierarchy of the religion, or it may have two 'arms,' but with the state administrative hierarchy subordinate to the religious hierarchy.
Theocracy should be distinguished from other secular forms of government that have a state religion, or are merely influenced by theological or moral concepts, and monarchies held "By the Grace of God".



gerçi ben şunu isterdim olmasını:

teknokrasi said:

Technocracy is a form of government in which engineers, scientists, health professionals and other technical experts are in control of decision making in their respective fields. The term technocracy derives from the Greek words tekhne meaning skill and kratos meaning power, as in government, or rule. Thus the term technocracy denotes a system of government where those who have knowledge, expertise or skills compose the governing body. In a technocracy decision makers would be selected based upon how highly knowledgeable they are, rather than how much political capital they hold.
Technocrats are individuals with technical training and occupations who perceive many important societal problems as being solvable, often while proposing technology-focused solutions. The administrative scientist Gunnar K. A. Njalsson theorizes that technocrats are primarily driven by their cognitive "problem-solution mindsets" and only in part by particular occupational group interests. Their activities and the increasing success of their ideas are thought to be a crucial factor behind the modern spread of technology and the largely ideological concept of the "Information society." Technocrats may be distinguished from "econocrats" and "bureaucrats" whose problem-solution mindsets differ from those of the technocrats.
In all cases technical and leadership skills are selected through bureaucratic processes on the basis of specialized knowledge and performance, rather than democratic elections. Some forms of technocracy are a form of meritocracy, a system where the "most qualified" and those who decide the validity of qualifications are the same people. Other forms have been described as not being an oligarchic human group of controllers, but rather an administration by science without the influence of special interest groups.


işi uzmanına bıraksınlar diye düşünüyorum...
Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş
tinu Mentor

tinu

Mesaj tarihi:
Mesaj tarihi:
otokrasi mi ileri! demokrasi mi onu bilmem de, 2.5 aylık bir bebeğin açlıktan! öldüğü bir türkiye dir 2011 türkiyesi!

Çoğu zaman komşularının verdiği yemekle karınlarını doyurmaya çalıştıklarını da söyleyen anne Bakırcı, "Mecburum dilenmesem tencerem kaynamıyor. Çocuklarım ne yiyecek? Dilenerek aldığım parayla tencere mi kaynatayım, çocuklarıma bez mi alayım, ölen kızıma mama mı alayım?" diyerek gözyaşlarını tutamadı. Daha önce gittiği doktorların bile kendisine yardım ettiğini, onların verdikleri mama ile kızını beslediğini ama kurtaramadıklarını da anlatan Necla Bakırcı, "Sütüm yok. Çayla insanın sütü olur mu? İki günden beri tenceremde yemek yok. Komşularım bir tabak yemek getirecek de çocuklarım yiyecek" diyerek yaşadıkları acı hayatı anlatmaya çalıştı.

İŞ KAZASI GEÇİREN BABA DA SAKAT OLDUĞU İÇİN ÇALIŞAMIYOR

Eşinin anlattıklarını çaresizlik içerisinde dinleyen ve kendisinin de 2008 yılında üzerine vinç düşmesi sonucu sağ ayağının bilekten aşağısının koptuğunu söyleyen 26 yaşındaki Murat Bakırcı da "Bu yüzden çalışamıyorum. Çalışamadığım için evime ekmek getiremiyorum. Kızımın ölme sebebi açlık. Durumumuzun ne olduğu belli. Yardım bekliyoruz. İki tane daha çocuğum var. Bakamıyorum, muhtacım. Elimden bir şey gelmiyor" diye konuştu. Murat Bakırc, bu sözlerinin ardından da gözyaşlarına hakim olamadı. Gözü yaşlı baba, evdeki boş buzdolabını da göstererek yardım istedi."

başbakanı yuhlayan bir taraftar vardı hani ne oldu onlara, stadı verdilermi gs ye?
Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş
tinu Mentor

tinu

Mesaj tarihi:
Mesaj tarihi:
cahillik deniyor ne yazikki buna , biz yapalım allah rızkını verir mantığı, e padişahımızda arada çıkıyor 3 çocuk yapın diyor, tamam işte, ama zaten bu eğitim düzeyinde yetişmiş insanlardan bunu düşünmelerini bekleyemezsin, ama belediye nerde? bu insanlar gibi binlerce insan var açlık içinde yaşayan işsiz güçsüz , ve cahiller bu şartlara rağmen 5 er tanede çocuklarıda var en az, e ne olacak bu insanlar, içlerinden birinin bebeği ölecek bu gazeteye yansayacak sonra o bölgenin belediye başkanı çıkacak tv ye tamam duruma el attık diğer çocuklarla aile ile ilgileniyoruz diye açıklama yapacak. olan daha hayata merhaba diyemeden açlıktan öle kübra bebeklere olacak.
Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş
 Paylaş
Konu listesine dön
×
×
  • Yeni Oluştur...