Jump to content
Forumu Destekleyenlere Katılın ×
Paticik Forumları
2000 lerden beri faal olan, çok şukela bir paylaşım platformuyuz. Hoşgeldiniz.

1 9 25 64 ?


Ferrero

Öne çıkan mesajlar

Arma said:

0 dan 1 e 1 artmış 1 kere sonra karesi alınmış 1
1 den 2 artmış 3 olmuş 3 ün karesi 9
3 ten 2 artmış 5 olmuş 5 in karesi 25
5 ten 3 artmış 8 olmuş 8 in karesi 64
8 den 3 artacak 11 olmuş 11 in karesi 121
11 den 3 artacak 14 olmuş 14 ün karesi 216
.
.
.
diye gidecek.
Kalın olan kısımlarda 1 artışı 1 kere
2 artışı 2 kere
3 artışı 3 kere olacak

Feci uydurdum.


Mantıklı...
Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş

http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=Zfw2j5nTtksC&pg=PA39&lpg=PA39&dq=%221+9+25+64%22&source=bl&ots=jK3RfawD12&sig=Z0Nvh7Q9rM6SYzHN2XGkbzDmIys&hl=en&ei=5Zs6SvHxBsjdsgaqz9GrCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9
1 9 25 64 100 144 225.

http://www.google.com.tr/search?q=%221+3+5+8+10+12+15+17+19+21+23+25+27+29%22
hatta, 289 441 ...


hatta,
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0807/0807.3252v2.pdf
pdf said:

...The next question we consider is: how does the time
evolution of the reconnected flux vary with the ionelectron
mass ratio? Such question historically was relevant
because of the inability of performing realistic ionelectron
mass ratio (1836) numerical simulation, due
to lack of computational resources. Although within
our reach computationally, we do not show here results
mi/me > 100 because the total energy conservation error
(which is defined as (E(ωpet = 250) − E(ωpet =
0))/E(ωpet = 0) and is indicative of the code accuracy)
starts to deteriorate to values of circa 10% for
mi/me = 400, while for mi/me = 100 it is 0.04% (both
for α = 1.2). In order to be able to compare our results
with the previous work [8], when varying mi/me, we accordingly
adjust number of spatial grid points and total
time step. Such adjustments insure that spatial scale of
the simulation box, is Lx = Ly = 4c/ωpi, and the time
scale, ωcit = 25. Thus when setting mi/me = 1, 9, 25, 64
and 100, Accordingly, the system size is adjusted to
40, 120, 200, 320 and 400. The global reconnection size
is fixed at L = 200. Ion cyclotron frequency for each
case is defined using by the magnetic intensity at the
boundary.
In 2D the magnetic flux function can be defined as
ψ = −R Bxdy = R Bydx. In our simulation...
Link to comment
Sosyal ağlarda paylaş

×
×
  • Yeni Oluştur...